“On our assumptions, the speaker-hearer’s linguistic intuition is rather different from the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. Note that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not subject to the traditional practice of grammarians. This suggests that the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be arbitrary in the levels of acceptability from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual gibberish (eg (98d)). In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), relational information is to be regarded as a descriptive fact. To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), a descriptively adequate grammar delimits a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.”

Generated by a very short shell script, which promises to entertain you further here.